<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Amazon on The Dangling Pointer</title><link>https://aaron.blog/tags/amazon/</link><description>Recent content in Amazon on The Dangling Pointer</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2017 19:12:32 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://aaron.blog/tags/amazon/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Choosing Between Google, Amazon, &amp; iCloud Photos</title><link>https://aaron.blog/choosing-between-google-amazon-icloud-photos/</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2017 19:12:32 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://aaron.blog/choosing-between-google-amazon-icloud-photos/</guid><description>&lt;figure&gt;&lt;img src="photooptions.png" class="kg-image" alt="PhotoOptions" loading="lazy" width="402" height="350"&gt;&lt;/figure&gt;&lt;p&gt;I recently went down the rabbit hole of figuring out if I am using the right solution for offsite storage of my photo library. I've been using iCloud Photos for over a year and am not totally happy with the solution. I decided to try out both Amazon Prime Photos and Google Photos.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My home Internet connection has a 5Mb/s upload speed which feels pathetically slow. I wanted to test each solution with a good chunk of my photo library uploaded which made this a time-consuming experience. Here's what I came up with after about two weeks of futzing.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>